Jump to content

Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) at 04:22, 12 June 2016 (Fix Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL when perm identifier present (doi|bibcode|arxiv|pmid|jstor|isbn|issn|lccn|oclc|ismn|hdl) (rem access-date) using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (Pub .L.No. 107-118, 115 stat. 2356, "the Brownfields Law") was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 11, 2002. Brownfields are defined as, "A former industrial or commercial site where future use is affected by real or perceived environmental contamination."[1] The Brownfields Law amended the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) by providing funds to assess and clean up brownfields, clarifying CERCLA liability protections, and providing funds to enhance state and tribal response programs. Other related laws and regulations impact brownfields cleanup and reuse through financial incentives and regulatory requirements.

An Executive Take

The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act was a response to the 1980 act entitled The Superfund, which forced industries to pay for their own toxic spills and general pollution. President Bush cited in his address, on January 11, 2002, that "American cities have many such eyesores; anywhere from 500,000 to a million brownfields are across our Nation." [2] In turn, this bill was created to put an end to the excess regulations and litigations many entrepreneurs incur when revitalizing dilapidated fields.[3]

A classic brownfield site - geograph.org.uk - 728293

Benefits

This act allows cash poor parties financial assistance, settling for smaller payment amounts, and alternative payment methods. This act also allows parties with property adjacent to the brownfields—which may contain hazardous wastes that infect their real estate—relief from the stipulations they would previously been accountable for. Additionally, the property owners whose groundwater is contaminated by erosion, upon passing the Act, are now exempt from installing remediation systems and having any further inspections. Previously responsible parties are now exempt from the Superfund's legislation. Innocent landowning parties can now be defended so long as they intend to fully cooperate with natural resource restoration, comply with restrictions on property, and not impede on the integrity of the ruling institution.

Exemptions

Groups that are looking to dispose of less than 110 gallons or 200 pounds of hazardous waste are exempt from this act, so long as the disposal occurred before April 1, 2001. The National Priorities List, a branch of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), also states that groups operating with fewer than 100 full-time employees are also exempt from former Superfund agreements. Additionally, the president retains the ability to override any exemptions he deems necessary due to maltreatment of natural resources. The president may also override any failed requests that were submitted by previously responsible parties, or current landowners .[4] In Section 221 of the act, anyone owning land adjacent to contaminated property that is releasing hazardous substances is also exempt from the stipulations previously required by The Superfund of 1980.

Stipulations

Landowners, upon passing The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownsfield Revitalization Act, are responsible to proceed with an "all appropriate inquiry" in which they ask previous owners of the nature of the lands use. Additionally, to carry out an all appropriate inquiry, the current landowner must take the customary steps toward protecting human activity from the contaminated area on the property and salvaging any natural resources contaminated by the contamination. Finally, the act requires an EPA administrator to make known any contamination upon the property publicly available within two years from discovery.[3]

Funding

Two sources of funding were derived from Section 104(k) within Subtitle A and Section 128(a) within Subtitle C of this Act that establishes $250 Million per year for brownfields revitalization.[5] Specifically, $200 million per year for brownfields assessment, cleanup, revolving loans, and environmental job training, and $50 million per year to assist State and Tribal response programs. The Environmental Protection Agency's Brownfields Program collaborates with other EPA programs, federal partners, and state agencies to identify and leverage resources that can be used for brownfields activities.[6] These collaborations lead to a process of engagement reliant upon public–private partnerships to turn dilapidated properties into viable economic redevelopments or "green-space" throughout the country. Funding criteria include the extent to which the money will be used to protect human health, and the environment, spur redevelopment and create jobs, preserve open space and parks, represent a “fair” distribution between urban and rural areas, address “sensitive populations”, and involve the local community.[7]

Land Revitalization

Due to the issuance of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA/Superfund) signed 1980 and subsequent court decisions imposing cleanup liability on a wide range of entities involved with a contaminated property, people began to avoid the redevelopment, reuse, and revitalization of properties identified with previous commercial or industrial business practices.[8] One of the most significant hurdles cities, communities, and private sector players face when trying to acquire and redevelop contaminated property is the lack of capital to provide essential early-stage activities such as site assessment, remediation, response action, and cleanup.[7] This Act provides a solution to those hurdles by providing increased funding for site evaluation and cleanup, Superfund liability reform and brownfields liability clarifications, and new limitations on EPA authority as it relates to state response programs.[9]

Project Cycle Description

The life cycle of a brownfields project begins when an eligible entity identifies a brownfield property in its community and also identifies the community's redevelopment needs and goals. This property then undergoes an All Appropriate Inquiry or Environmental Site Assessment to assess the potential liability associated. If a recognized environmental concern is found, the extent of historical contamination associated with the property is assessed. Once the extent of historical contamination is delineated in all directions, the site undergoes remediation to make the land protective of human health and the environment. When the cleanup of a site is accomplished, the property is ready for redevelopment or revitalization. If no liabilities or recognized environmental concerns are found within the All Appropriate Inquiry or Environmental Site Assessment the property can skip the assessment and remediation stages within the project cycle and go directly to redevelopment.

Public-Private Partnership through Brownfields Redevelopment

public–private partnership's have been defined as long-term relationships between fundamentally different sectors that are focused on the development of infrastructure required for rendering of services and a more effective rendering of public services, seeking to ensure social economic development at national, regional and local levels.[10] The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act has created a new platform for multi-sector collaboration by creating a process of engagement between entities. A mechanism within this platform includes state response program grants authorized by CERCLA Section 128(a)(1) that seek to protect human health and the environment by encouraging the voluntary investigation and cleanup of properties by establishing memorandum of agreements/understandings with state environmental authorities.[11] When a brownfields site is in a state response program, the responsible party is protected from enforcement.[12] This protection and the available resources to provide environmental site assessments and limited cleanups are the attributes that encourage the revitalization of historic sites with an industrial past. In Texas, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has a Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) that provides administrative, technical, and legal incentives to participants for investigation, cleanup, and redevelopment.[13]

Discovery Green

In 2004, a public-private partnership to secure a site in downtown Houston, Texas was formed by the Brown Foundation, the Kinder Foundation, the Wortham Foundation, the Houston Endowment, Inc., and the City of Houston to create the Discovery Green Conservancy.[14] This group envisioned turning an undeveloped and underused parking lot with a long history of industrial occupants into a downtown city park. The Discovery Green Conservancy is a private nonprofit organization formed to raise funds, operate and care for this park.[14]

Typically, sights with an industrial past equate to environmental issues. The affected property assessment of this site revealed soils impacted by metals and petroleum hydrocarbons, and groundwater impacted by volatile organic compounds. To remediate this site, impacted soils were properly disposed of at an offsite permitted recycling facility and groundwater was treated with an in-situ bioremediation microorganisms.[14] When the site was remediated to be protective of human health and the environment, it received a VCP Certificate of Completion and construction on the park began.

Discovery Green is now a beautiful, vibrant 12-acre park in the heart of downtown Houston that opened to the public in April 2008.[15] The total cost to acquire the land that became Discovery Green was approximately $57 million, and the total cost to build, landscape, and complete the project was approximately $125 million.[15] Since opening in 2008, the park has helped drive convention activity and has served as a catalyst for $625 million in downtown development.[15]

Ongoing Issues

The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act exemplifies collaborative approaches to encourage voluntary environmental improvements, an increasingly prominent alternative to traditional regulatory models of environmental protection.[8] However, issues such as the stigmatization of sites, limited amount of awarded grant funds, and disparity in award funding are common hurdles the Brownfields policy currently faces. To resolve these issues the Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development (BUILD) Act of 2013 was introduced to the 113 Congress on March 7, 2013.[16] This Act proposes to expand eligibility, increase funding for remediation grants, and give priority to small communities including Indian Tribes, rural and low-income areas with a population of less than 15,000.[17]

References

  1. ^ "Definition". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 2011-04-26.
  2. ^ "ALERT - Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act". HG.org Worldwide Legal Directories. Retrieved 2011-02-13.
  3. ^ a b "Superfund Gets the Super Shaft". TIME. Retrieved 2014-10-21.
  4. ^ "Bush Signs Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act". Green Truck. Retrieved 2011-02-21.
  5. ^ "SMALL BUSINESS LIABILITY RELIEF AND BROWNFIELDS REVITALIZATION ACT". www.gpo.org. U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved 1 December 2014.
  6. ^ "US EPA Grants & Funing". http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/grant_info/index.htm. EPA. Retrieved 11 November 2014. {{cite web}}: External link in |website= (help)
  7. ^ a b Bartsch, Charles (2003). "The New Federal Law on Brownfields: The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act". Environmental Practices. 5 (1): 48–52. doi:10.1017/s146604660303014x.
  8. ^ a b Dull, Mathew; Wernsted, Kris (2010). "Land Recycling, Community Revitalization, and Distributive Politics: An Analysis of EPA Brownfields Program Support". Policy ScienceS. 38 (1): 119–141. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00347.x. Retrieved 5 December 2013.
  9. ^ Burnham-Howard, Corey (2004). "Building on Brownfields: Predicted Effects of New Liability Protections for Prospective Purchasers and an Exploration of Other Redevelopment Incentives". Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 130 (3): 212–225. doi:10.1061/(asce)1052-3928(2004)130:3(212). ISSN 1052-3928. Retrieved 5 December 2013.
  10. ^ Tunčikienė, Živilė (2014). "Development of Public-Private Partnership: Managerial Aspects". Business Theory and Practice. 15 (1): 11–21. doi:10.3846/btp.2014.02. ISSN 1648-0627.
  11. ^ "State & Tribal Response Program Agreements". US EPA. Retrieved 4 December 2014.
  12. ^ http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/state_tribal/moas_mous/tx_moa1.pdf. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. ^ "Voluntary Cleanup Program".
  14. ^ a b c Berksan, Annette (2011). "Discovery Green: A Green Transformation in Downtown Houston". Texas Bar Journal. 74 (5): 409.
  15. ^ a b c "History of Discovery Green". Discovery Green.
  16. ^ Lautenburg, Frank. "Brownfields Utilization, Investment, and Local Development Act of 2013". https://www.congress.gov/. S.491 – 113th Congress. {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); External link in |website= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  17. ^ "S. Rept. 113-186 - BROWNFIELDS UTILIZATION, INVESTMENT, AND LOCAL DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2013".
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Small_Business_Liability_Relief_and_Brownfields_Revitalization_Act&oldid=724884104"