Southern strategy: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 02:4802:48, 27 August 2013 CartoonDiablo talk contribs 41,106 bytes −315 Revert good faith edit, according to the sources it was "alleged" by GOP strategists including Lee Attwater. undo
curprev 00:5400:54, 27 August 2013 Scott Illini talk contribs 41,421 bytes +63 more accuracy undo
curprev 00:2200:22, 27 August 2013 Scott Illini talk contribs 41,358 bytes +252 →Evolution: attempt to balance undo

curprev 04:5204:52, 16 August 2013 Atethnekos talk contribs 41,033 bytes −40 →Evolution: comment about same sex and abortion was just one basically random person who was interviewed while shopping; article doesn undo
curprev 00:2100:21, 16 August 2013 204.73.55.131 talk 41,073 bytes +16 →Evolution undo
curprev 00:2000:20, 16 August 2013 204.73.55.131 talk 41,057 bytes +47 →Evolution undo

curprev 18:5118:51, 8 August 2013 CartoonDiablo talk contribs 41,010 bytes +715 Undid revision 567600356 by MastCell (talk) No reason to remove an RS simply because someone wants it removed. undo
curprev 05:4505:45, 8 August 2013 Witan talk contribs m 40,295 bytes 0 wiki formatting undo

curprev 21:3921:39, 4 July 2013 CartoonDiablo talk contribs 43,162 bytes +3 (Rv) The sources (especially Atwater) put the blame on racism. Whether or not it's "per se" or just appealing to racists is not a distinction anyone has made. undo
curprev 21:2921:29, 4 July 2013 Bishonen talk contribs 43,159 bytes −759 Undid revision 562886181 by 24.68.156.178 (talk) Rv POV. Read WP:UNDUE. (Your first edit seems acceptable to me, but not the second.) undo
curprev 21:2421:24, 4 July 2013 24.68.156.178 talk 43,918 bytes +759 →Introduction: The sources here aren't sufficient to justify anything beyond saying that the intention of this link was claimed in the context of a campaign by political opponents. Added the standard counter punditry. undo
curprev 21:1021:10, 4 July 2013 24.68.156.178 talk 43,159 bytes −3 As is clearly seen in Boyd, and summarized in this articles own introduction (taken from that source), and shown in the 2005 apology, there is no agreement that there was an appeal to racism, per se. Changed text to reflect the agreed form of the strategy undo

curprev 23:0423:04, 29 June 2013 Gobonobo talk contribs 43,194 bytes −490 restoring previous version - 'claimed' is a weasel word, restoring deleted mention of dixiecrats, desegregation undo
curprev 22:0722:07, 29 June 2013 Pendergast4 talk contribs 43,684 bytes +490 Started fixing some major errors in this page, but it will need a LOT of work. undo

curprev 22:4422:44, 19 June 2013 Gamaliel talk contribs 43,370 bytes −454 Reverted to revision 559670331 by FurrySings: yes we all know what a left-winger Lee Atwater was. (TW) undo
curprev 22:0122:01, 19 June 2013 74.136.91.132 talk 43,824 bytes +454 While a fair representation of a far left wing theory, this article needs to be restated to indicate its conjectural nature, while my time did not allow me to complete that process, this article overstates the evidence. undo

curprev 02:0302:03, 7 May 2013 Alf.laylah.wa.laylah talk contribs m 43,369 bytes 0 Reverted 1 edit by 67.176.15.218 (talk) to last revision by Skylights76. (TW) undo
curprev 02:0102:01, 7 May 2013 67.176.15.218 talk 43,369 bytes 0 No edit summary undo

curprev 22:5022:50, 13 April 2013 Bishonen talk contribs 43,369 bytes −11 Rv. Please stop adding this tendentious nonsense that contradicts the rest of the article. undo
curprev 22:2122:21, 13 April 2013 70.51.226.136 talk 43,380 bytes +2 No edit summary undo
curprev 22:2022:20, 13 April 2013 70.51.226.136 talk 43,378 bytes +10 No edit summary undo

curprev 22:0322:03, 12 April 2013 Bishonen talk contribs 43,368 bytes −9 Undid revision 550066523 by 144.15.255.227 (talk) The first line is supposed to fit with the rest of the lead, the rest of the article, and the references. undo