Stokes' paradox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In the science of fluid flow, Stokes' paradox is the phenomenon that there can be no creeping flow of a fluid around a disk in two dimensions; or, equivalently, the fact there is no non-trivial steady-state solution for the Stokes equations around an infinitely long cylinder. This is opposed to the 3-dimensional case, where Stokes' method provides a solution to the problem of flow around a sphere.[1][2]


The velocity vector of the fluid may be written in terms of the stream function as

The stream function in a Stokes flow problem, satisfies the biharmonic equation.[3] By regarding the -plane as the complex plane, the problem may be dealt with using methods of complex analysis. In this approach, is either the real or imaginary part of


Here , where is the imaginary unit, , and are holomorphic functions outside of the disk. We will take the real part without loss of generality. Now the function , defined by is introduced. can be written as , or (using the Wirtinger derivatives). This is calculated to be equal to

Without loss of generality, the disk may be assumed to be the unit disk, consisting of all complex numbers z of absolute value smaller or equal to 1.

The boundary conditions are:

whenever ,[1][5] and by representing the functions as Laurent series:[6]

the first condition implies for all .

Using the polar form of results in . After deriving the series form of u, substituting this into it along with , and changing some indices, the second boundary condition translates to

Since the complex trigonometric functions compose a linearly independent set, it follows that all coefficients in the series are zero. Examining these conditions for every after taking into account the condition at infinity shows that and are necessarily of the form

where is an imaginary number (opposite to its own complex conjugate), and and are complex numbers. Substituting this into gives the result that globally, compelling both and to be zero. Therefore, there can be no motion – the only solution is that the cylinder is at rest relative to all points of the fluid.


The paradox is caused by the limited validity of Stokes' approximation, as explained in Oseen's criticism: the validity of Stokes' equations relies on Reynolds number being small, and this condition cannot hold for arbitrarily large distances .[7][2]

A correct solution for a cylinder was derived using Oseen's equations, and the same equations lead to an improved approximation of the drag force on a sphere.[8][9]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Lamb, Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics (Sixth ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 602–604.
  2. ^ a b Van Dyke, Milton (1975). Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Parabolic Press.
  3. ^ Lamb, Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics (Sixth ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 602.
  4. ^ Weisstein, Eric W. (2002). CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics. CRC Press. ISBN 1584883472.
  5. ^ Lamb, Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics (Sixth ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 615.
  6. ^ Sarason, Donald (1994). Notes on Complex Function Theory. Berkeley, California.
  7. ^ Lamb, Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics (Sixth ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 608–609.
  8. ^ Lamb, Horace (1945). Hydrodynamics (Sixth ed.). New York: Dover Publications. pp. 609–616.
  9. ^ Goldstein, Sydney (1965). Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. Dover Publications.