Superdiversity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Superdiversity, or super-diversity, is a social science term and concept often said to have been coined by sociologist Steven Vertovec in a 2007 article in Ethnic and Racial Studies,[1][2] but which he first used in a BBC article in 2005.[3]

Definition and usage[edit]

The term superdiversity is used to refer to some current levels of population diversity that are significantly higher than before.[4] Vertovec argues superdiversity in Britain "is distinguished by a dynamic interplay of variables among an increased number of new, small and scattered, multiple-origin, transnationally connected, socio-economically differentiated and legally stratified immigrants who have arrived over the last decade".[1] It denotes increased diversity not only between immigrant and ethnic minority groups, but also within them. It has also been called the "diversification of diversity".[5] Vertovec gives the example of Somalis in the United Kingdom, arguing that the Somali community includes British citizens, refugees and asylum seekers, people granted exceptional leave to remain, undocumented migrants, and secondary migrants from other European states.[1] Parveen Akhtar, a sociologist at the University of Bradford, argues that the UK is no longer characterized by diversity but by superdiversity: "Post-1945 you had large waves of immigration from fewer places in the world, largely from the former colonies. Now, since the 1980s, you’ve got smaller waves of immigration from a wider range of places".[6]

According to Nasar Meer, "Super-diversity has emerged both as a description of empirical phenomena (the proliferation of diversities) and as a normative claim that increased pluralism (both associated with migration as well as wider changes in our understanding of identity categories) requires social scientists and policy makers to develop approaches to register this".[7]

According to Fran Meissner and Steven Vertovec, writing in 2015, the concept of superdiversity has been the subject of "considerable attention" since Vertovec introduced it in 2005. They note that Vertovec's 2007 article in Ethnic and Racial Studies is the most cited article in the history of the journal.[8] The concept has started to influence the fields of sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology.[9]

Criticism[edit]

Some authors are critical of the concept of superdiversity. Sinfree B. Makoni argues that the concept "contains a powerful sense of social romanticism, creating an illusion of equality in a highly asymmetrical world, particularly in contexts characterized by a search for homogenization...I find it disconcerting, to say the least, to have an open celebration of diversity in societies marked by violent xenophobia, such as South Africa".[10] Ana Deumert argues: “The use of ‘superdiverse’ as a descriptive adjective, is a theoretical cul-de-sac, because the complexities brought about by diversity in the social world ultimately defy numerical measurement”[11] The claims of increased migrations and diversity have been challenged by Czajka and de Haas (2014). They observe that while globally the number of migrants has increased so has the world population so the proportion of migrants has actually decreased. In the Americas migration has increased but diversity hasn't. The fact that migrations have centered on a “shrinking pool of prime destination countries” (many of them small countries in Western Europe) led them to conclude that “the idea that immigration has become more diverse may partly reveal a Eurocentric worldview”[12] Aneta Pavlenko argues that superdiversity is an exercise in academic branding which fails as an academic term:[13]

The uptake of the slippery slogan is not surprising. The aesthetic appeal of truthiness and the illusion of novelty, contemporaneity and relevance undoubtedly explain some of the attraction yet we cannot ignore the fact that the advent of superdiversity provided scholars of multilingualism with a new means to move up the academic ladder, distinguish their publications, and fund their work.

Researchers and research institutes[edit]

Key researchers working on superdiversity include Vertovec, Jan Blommaert and Jenny Phillimore. The University of Birmingham established the Institute for Research into Superdiversity in 2013.[14] The Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity in Göttingen is also an important centre for superdiversity research.[15]

New Zealand's "Superdiversity Stocktake: Impact on Business, Government and on New Zealand" was launched in November 2015[16] and sponsored by banks, companies, the Human Rights Commission, and the Ministry of Education. A study on "Implications of Superdiversity for NZ’s Electoral Laws and Democracy" was also launched. Both projects were carried out by the Superdiversity Centre for Law, Policy and Business, which describes itself as "a multidisciplinary centre specialising in analysing the law, policy and business implications of New Zealand’s superdiversity".[17][18] Its patron is Sir Anand Satyanand and its chair is Mai Chen.[19]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Vertovec, Steven (2007). "Super-diversity and its implications". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 30 (6): 1024–1054. doi:10.1080/01419870701599465. S2CID 143674657.
  2. ^ "Research focus". Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  3. ^ "Opinion: Super-diversity revealed". BBC News. 20 September 2005. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
  4. ^ "About superdiversity". University of Birmingham. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  5. ^ "Recognise superdiversity in S'pore to overcome stereotyping". Today. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
  6. ^ Ratcliffe, Rebecca (8 October 2014). "How will 'super diversity' affect the future of British politics". The Guardian. Retrieved 22 February 2015.
  7. ^ Meer, Nasar (2014). Key Concepts in Race and Ethnicity. London: Sage. p. 144. ISBN 9780857028686.
  8. ^ Meissner, Fran; Vertovec, Steven (2015). "Comparing super-diversity". Ethnic and Racial Studies. 38 (4): 541–555. doi:10.1080/01419870.2015.980295. S2CID 144463125.
  9. ^ Mutsaers, Paul; Swanenberg, Jos (2012). "Super-diversity at the margins? Youth language in North Brabant, The Netherlands". Sociolinguistic Studies. 6 (1): 65–89. doi:10.1558/sols.v6i1.65.
  10. ^ Makoni, Sinfree B. (2012). "A Critique of Language, Languaging and Supervernacular". Muitas Vozes. 1 (2): 189–199. doi:10.5212/MuitasVozes.v.1i2.0003.
  11. ^ Deumert, A. (2014) Digital superdiversity: A commentary. Discourse, Context, and Media,4-5, 116-120.
  12. ^ Czajka, M. & de Haas (2014) The globalization of migration: Has the world become more migratory? International Migration Review, 48, 2, 283-323.
  13. ^ Pavlenko, A (2016) Superdiversity and why it isn't: Reflections on terminological innovations and academic branding
  14. ^ Elkes, Neil (14 June 2013). "Superdiversity represents real opportunity for Birmingham". Birmingham Post. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  15. ^ "Exploring Superdiversity at the Max Planck Institute". Interland at Aston University. Aston University. 17 November 2014. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  16. ^ "New Zealand needs to adapt to diversity". Stuff.co.nz. 10 November 2015. Retrieved 16 March 2016.
  17. ^ "Superdiversity Stocktake to launch". Immigration New Zealand. 1 October 2015. Archived from the original on 2 February 2016. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  18. ^ "Superdiversity Centre for Law, Policy and Business". Chen Palmer. Retrieved 2 November 2015.
  19. ^ "Key Personnel". Chen Palmer. Retrieved 2 November 2015.

General references[edit]

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Superdiversity&oldid=1149585298"