Talk:Dwell (retailer): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:47, 20 November 2010

Edits by people associated with this company

It has been claimed this article has been edited by persons with close association with the company.

However, all information in the article is entirely factual, and no opinions are expressed. As long as the article continues to be entirely factual, please do not vandalise it / disturb it's progress.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Edits by people associated with this company==
-The following was dumped on my talkpage:
-:Hi, I noticed you edited the Dwell retail page, to downgrade the company's status from 20 stores to 19. Please explain this to me; write to john_secure@yahoo.com. Please do not make further libelous edits to the [[Dwell (retailer)]]. Dwell is a company and you must not make false edits to it's page.  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.100.64.222|81.100.64.222]] ([[User talk:81.100.64.222|talk]]) 00:43, 9 November 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-::Thank you for your message, but can I please refer you to the rules of wikipedia, [[WP:AGF]]. I edited the article down from a piece of spam, to something which could pass for a suitable entry to an encyclopedia. The number of stores at that point according to teh companies website was 19 - hence the downgrade. The article still lacks inline references (the tag for which I note that you removed), and without such could therefore be subject to removal. As I assume you are associated with the company, please note your association on the articles talkpage under [[WP:BIAS]], and add suitable inline references which back up the claims you have added. Rgds, --[[User:Trident13|Trident13]] ([[User talk:Trident13#top|talk]]) 01:19, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
+It has been claimed this article has been edited by persons with close association with the company.
+However, all information in the article is entirely factual, and no opinions are expressed. As long as the article continues to be entirely factual, please do not vandalise it / disturb it's progress.
-[[Image:Ambox warning blue.svg|left|48px|]] In my opinion, this article either does not [[WP:Verifiability|verifiably]] satisfy the [[WP:Notability|Notability]] criteria for [[WP:CORP|Organizations and companies]], or it may violate the [[WP:COI|Conflict of interest]] guideline, or perhaps it is a [[WP:COPYVIO|Copyright violation]].
-Wikipedia articles must be [[WP:RS|based on reliable sources]] to [[WP:V|verify]] any claims of notability. Even though the lack of [[Wikipedia:Third-party sources|third-party sources]] in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely ''no'' sources (or only [[WP:EL|external links]] to ''unreliable'' ones, or [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]) suggests to some editors that multiple independent reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
-Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the [[WP:DELETE|Deletion policy]], I am nonetheless willing to assist '''User:{{User|81.100.64.222}}''', and other recent contributors to this article, to make some constructive improvements to it … I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
-Please respond on ''this'' Discussion page, instead of on ''my'' Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.
-To better understand why I have used this template, please read ''[[:Template:Flag-templates#Flag templates for deletion warnings|Flag templates for deletion warnings]]'' … I realize that some of the expressed ''possible'' concerns may not be appropriate in this case. <!-- Template:Flag-editor -->[[Category:Flagged articles]]