Talk:Lanny A. Breuer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:04, 8 January 2012

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Untitled

Hey, regarding the speedy deletion tag, I made this page because I looked him up after the NY Times ran a story about Roger Clemens' upcoming testimony to Congress -- Breuer was retained to represent Clemens. All that came up was http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton in which Breuer is one of only two lawyers on Clinton's defense team with no individual page.Shayanakadidal (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lanny Breuer needs sections added on Fast & Furious and Roger Clemmons defense

Hello. A bit unhappy and also a bit sceptical as to the unbiassed bent of Wiki now. Breuer def needs a thorough section on his obvious involvement in Operation Fast & Furious. There are PLENTY of subjects on this website where suspicions of involvement are parsed and detailed. This page on Breuer should be no exception. When Americans are killed with guns the DEA gave to Mexican thugs, they should be able to know that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrapette Jones (talk • contribs) 01:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'Fast and Furious' scandal information is censorship-banned on Wikipedia

Some helpful person named Edinburgh Wanderer removed my edits related to Senator Grassley asking for the resignation of Breuer, and the articles stating (in clear language, in the title) that Breuer got caught lying. "Contributions not constructive". Really.

Maybe in Edinburgh, that's how things work. But in the United States, we call that censorship.

Dudes, this is an encyclopedia. Not the.... I don't know what. Whatever it is that you edit at-will and erase at-will in Edinburgh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Turtlewaxingmycar (talk • contribs) 17:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i suggest you read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. if you can comply with that then go ahead but it must be neutral. Also the reason your edits were reverted were because [[1]] gloo identified them as vandalism. Edinburgh Wanderer 17:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Hello. A bit unhappy and also a bit sceptical as to the unbiassed bent of Wiki now. Breuer def needs a thorough section on his obvious involvement in Operation Fast & Furious. There are PLENTY of subjects on this website where suspicions of involvement are parsed and detailed. This page on Breuer should be no exception. When Americans are killed with guns the DEA gave to Mexican thugs, they should be able to know that.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Scrapette Jones|Scrapette Jones]] ([[User talk:Scrapette Jones|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Scrapette Jones|contribs]]) 01:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-== Censorship rules on Wikipedia ==
+== 'Fast and Furious' scandal information is censorship-banned on Wikipedia ==
 Some helpful person named [[Edinburgh Wanderer]] removed my edits related to Senator Grassley asking for the resignation of Breuer, and the articles stating (in clear language, in the title) that Breuer got caught lying.  "Contributions not constructive".  Really.