Talk:À cause de l'automne

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The title of the song its with "À" not in the way who written, so changed be cause in French is very important this details.--189.203.69.24 (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In written French, the acute accent mark is rarely written on top of a capitalized letter, as it is difficult to write with a standard French keyboard. Also the pronounciation doesn't change if it is with the accent or not, hence it is not that important (and is often omitted). But yes, you are correct that it should have it when written exactly the right way. RMJJRM (talk) 06:02, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection

This article being very current and constantly changing when new information is coming, I would like to ask this page semi-protection due to heavy misinformation added on the page by unidentified users. Lots of unsourced, inaccurate and plain false information has been added by the same person using dynamic IP and hence difficult to communicate. Maintaining the page up to date and keep it factual is difficult at it's current state. RMJJRM (talk) 06:05, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) If you'd like to make a request for semi-protection, then you can do so at WP:RPP. Please don't use the {{Edit semi-protected}} template to request protection, as that isn't what it it intended for. David 1217 ^{What I've done} 16:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's true. It's been really long time I have had any need for such thing. I will see anyways if this post makes any difference here, maybe it got everyone attention. If not then I will ask proper way for the protection. RMJJRM (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are so many noticeboards, pages, forums, etc., that it is hard to find the right one much of the time. I'd ask at [[WP:RPP] if you want the article protected—I doubt anyone will notice it otherwise. David 1217 ^{What I've done} 04:09, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right now the situation seems to be ok. The editing has been calmed down a bit so it's easier to keep the page clean. If necessary I will do proper request later. --RMJJRM (talk) 21:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Critics

If anyone knows any (positive or negative) critics written by (semi-)professionals (or seriously taken authors) on any major music website, radio station or webzine/magazine, then please provide the links. I have tried to find some critics from the net but there simply aren't anything that I could find with google search (other than some forum messages but they are not really useful as references). The single seems to be widely neglated everywhere in the world (especially in France) by authors. There is currently only one reference, which has quotes of random anonymous listeners around the world. They have only picked the positive comments and given no example of the countless negative comments that has been also given all over the net (even on fan sites/forums). Those are not relevant enough to be quoted on wiki article as it clearly isn't objective view on the matter. Some article (with comments about the song) or forum thread on ChartsInFrance could be considered as a valid reference link as they have wide enough audience to give objective enough view of the song (meaning that there are people who like it and who doesn't). --RMJJRM (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]