Talk:.mail

Fair use rationale for Image:Spamhaus.jpg

Image:Spamhaus.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image removed as it is no longer really relevant. Article updated to match the infobox format used on the [[.corp] and .home domains. DeadGrue (talk) 14:39, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POV-check

This article seems to be written from the point of view of the people proposing the domain. Needs some analysis from neutral sources.

Apologies in advance if pov-check is the wrong template for this situation. -DonkeyKong64 (Mathematician in training) (talk) 04:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed what I found to be the non-neutral parts, and the tag. -- Beland (talk) 16:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I also did an edit that should have the POV issue that is flagged here as well. DeadGrue (talk) 05:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

.email gTLD

Maybe this article should be rewritten to include the fact that, since January 2014, the gTLD .email has been approuved by ICANN. Pomologue (talk) 22:14, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected gTLD

I updated the article, linking to two associated articles that were created and affected by the same ICANN decision to reject and cancel processing of proposed .corp, .home, and .mail gTLDs. I'd remove the flagged header, but I'm fairly new and not sure how much my edits go towards resolving the issue. DeadGrue (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]