Talk:102 Incheon Tower

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Source(s) for ground break[edit]

Can they be added and the categories as well when ground breaks? Thank you -- (talk) 19:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


It appears this article is the same as Songdo Incheon Towers but is better developed. DaronDierkes (talk) 09:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Support Merge. I agree that both articles seem to refer to only one project. I can't find any sources that refer to both, or that suggest there are two different projects. I also can't find any reliable info on the current status. Is this in merely a proposal? Has construction started? Fredwerner (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Support Merge. The two articles are definitely redundant. They contain details that make it certain that they are discussing the same proposal. Scalzi+ | (Talk | contribs) 23:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Support Merge. I agree. It would be greatly apreciated if someone would merge the articles. Kevinkph85 (talk) 03:54, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


The cost US$ 15 billion is ten times the cost of Burj Khalifa. I find that hard to believe. (talk) 03:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

I adjusted the cost to the one listed for the project in the sources given. Blervis (talk) 00:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Tower Name[edit]

I was wondering if the name of the page should be changed to 102 Incheon Tower, as that is what it is called in the description. If nobody rejects within a week, I'll consider changing it.

Max 10:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


"er the late-2000s recession, the tower was postponed with the possibility of a redesign at a lower height. The height of the supertall was reduced from 780 metres to 600 metres ping the design the same" - What happened? "ping" - during? "the same" -?? Kdammers (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

102 or 115[edit]

The articled is titled 102, but the image is captioned as 115. Which is it? (talk) 09:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC) I changed it to the correct one, 102 Blervis (talk) 00:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)