Talk:10th Baluch Regiment

Military history: Asian / British / European / South Asia / World War I / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move DrKiernan (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I raise a question about the name of this? I accept that we sometimes need to use names invented after the event to distinguish (say) the modern Indian Army from the Indian Army (1895–1947) of British India, or in this case the Baloch Regiment of the old Indian Army from the Baloch Regiment of the Pakistan Army, but couldn't we use the more authentic name here of Baluch Regiment (Indian Army)? Regards, Xn4 (talk) 13:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having copyedited the text heavily, it's now clear that its just the 10th Baluch Regiment covered, so disambiguation is not needed, there only being one of these. I'll shift it along soon enough, assuming I don't need admin help.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does actually need admin help, if you have no objections, I'll request the move.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, 10th Baluch Regiment is even better. And I think perhaps Baluch Regiment should be a dab page instead of a redirect. Xn4 (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lt Gen HR Briggs, CB, DSO & Bar, Colonel of 2-10 Baluch 2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Lt Gen HR Briggs, CB, DSO & Bar, Colonel of 2-10 Baluch 2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]