Jump to content

Talk:10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 04:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC) RESERVED: For future review at the hands of me. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 04:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and Infobox

[edit]

These are fine. Now, on to the substance's review...

Preparations

[edit]

"...subcommittee of the 9th Central Committee, which was, in all likelihood, chaired by General Secretary Nông Đức Mạnh." Can you confirm that he chaired this committee?

Its uncertain who chaired it, but it is most probably chaired by Nong Duc Manh.. THis is sourced already... --TIAYN (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Done "...based their campaign on the fact that is son-in-law had worked at PMU 18 Department..." "...that his son...", you mean?
Everything else is good.

Delegates

[edit]

This section is fine.

The Congress and the 1st plenum

[edit]

Good here as well.

Policy enactments

[edit]

Solid here as well. Pass.

Democratization

[edit]

Pass here.

Acknowledgements

[edit]

Very nice section here, but I will need some prose from some sovereign states, not just the socialist parties of the world. I am sure countries like France, the UK, and Australia had to have commented.

Nope, not as I know off.... Western democratic countries don't usually support or acknowledge communist congresses (they didn't even do it during the hey-days of the Soviet Union). --TIAYN (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've added a bit about Hu Jintao if that helps... --TIAYN (talk) 14:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

[edit]

I learned a good deal about Vietnam reviewing this one, so thanks! As per the norm, when these issues are mitigated, I can pass this fine article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]