Jump to content

Talk:1678 Kediri campaign/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this on. Parsecboy (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sources:
    • I don't know that theses are considered reliable sources - has Kemper been published elsewhere? Ideally the thesis would have been turned into a book.
      • Good point. I looked it up and according to WP:SCHOLARSHIP "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence". I don't think this is the case for Kemper's thesis. I used it because it's in English, but discusses a lot of sources originally in Dutch or Javanese (which I don't read), and because it contains much greater detail about the campaign (because of the thesis's smaller scope) than the more general books. Given the policy, though, I will find other sources for the statements and remove some of them. Please give me some time to do it. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • What ref should "Ricklefs 1985" be pointing to?
    • If Andaya's and Ricklef's newer book aren't being used, they should be moved to a further reading section
  • Images check out.

Parsecboy (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Parsecboy for your review. I addressed most of your feedback above. Please give me several days to replace or remove the Kemper references, because I need to look up other sources. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Parsecboy: All Kemper references have been removed. Let me know if there's anything more I can do. HaEr48 (talk) 06:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It looks good to me - I'll pass it now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]