Jump to content

Talk:1993 Women's Cricket World Cup final/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AhmadLX (talk · contribs) 18:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 18:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article largely meets the criteria. A few minor points follow:

  • "However, in response, New Zealand enacted five run outs; the New Zealand captain,..." It should be mentioned here that NZ won the match. Currently it remains unclear and only a couple lines later does one know that from Raf Nicholson's comment.
  • " England scored 208 for five, aided by..." → "England scored 208 for five; aided by..." OR "England scored 208 for five. Aided by..."
  • "New Zealand were restricted to 154 runs by India, but three run outs and miserly bowling helped them to a 42-run victory." miserly bowling? It sounds like inadequate or deficient bowling by NZ.
  • "Tea was taken after 30 overs of the New Zealand innings: shortly thereafter..." → "Tea was taken after 30 overs of the New Zealand innings. Shortly thereafter..."
  • "Shortly thereafter two more wickets fell;" → "Shortly thereafter two more wickets fell:" i.e. colon instead of semicolon.
  • Umpires: Valerie Gibbens and Judith West. This should be referenced.
  • "The England captain, Smithies reflected..." → "The England captain Smithies reflected..." OR "The England captain, Smithies, reflected..."
  • "Former England player Sarah Potter said that "Progress..."". Either remove quotation marks and rephrase the quote or remove "that".
@AhmadLX: Thanks for the review; I have responded to each point above. Harrias talk 16:16, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pass. A nice article. AhmadLX-(Wikiposta) 17:18, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed