Talk:1st Indian Cavalry Division

Suggestions for improvement

I have just completed the B class checklist and feel the article could be improved by addressing the following issues:

• references: the article needs in line citations, at least one per paragraph for a B class;
• coverage: the article needs more content and an improved narrative - e.g. when was the division formed, how did it perform, what battles did it fight in, etc?
• structure: the article needs an introductory section that outlines the entire article;
• grammar: the article is really not big enough yet to assess grammar properly;
• supporting materials: an image would definately improve the article

Just some ideas. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Wrong redirect?

4th Cavalry Division redirects here, whereas 4th Cavalry Division (United Kingdom) redirects to Yeomanry Mounted Division. Yorkist (talk) 03:26, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1st Indian Cavalry Division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528042649/http://www.warpath.orbat.com/indian_cav/1_ind_cav_div.htm to http://www.warpath.orbat.com/indian_cav/1_ind_cav_div.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)