Jump to content

Talk:2001 Gujarat cyclone/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 17:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article. The prose is good and flows nicely.

  • The problem is three dead reference links.[1]

Otherwise, the article is fine.

Xtzou (Talk) 17:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Well written
    B. MoS compliance: Complies with required elements of MOS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Reliable sources
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: Well referenced
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects: Sets the context
    B. Focused: Remains focused on the topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: Great illustrations!
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Nice job. Xtzou (Talk) 13:11, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]