Talk:2005 North Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jason Rees (talk · contribs) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Hurricanehink, I am going to attempt to review this article for GAN.Jason Rees (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

• First off all most if not all of the other seasonal articles have the timeline image, on top of the seasonal summary section rather than below it.

• True, not sure why it was done this way. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• During the season - what season?

• It's synonymous with "the year". ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• storms - might be better to use the general term here and call them cyclonic disturbances

• Sounds good. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• No systems strengthened beyond cyclonic storm status - If so why is Fanoos classified on the timeline as a severe cyclonic storm?

• Beats me, I fixed it. Could have been a typo. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Might be good to see a basic summary - take 1990 as a basic example of what i mean

• I disagree, respectfully. There is a basic summary in the lead already. No need for an additional one in the SS. 1990 could probably use its summary for its lead (which is only one paragraph long). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Hibaru could do with a few tweaks to make it more readable IMO.

• I believe I got this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Try changing The convection consolidated as an elongated circulation became evident. to Over the next few days the convection consolidated as an elongated.... I suggest this as I feel like the reader needs some concept to time here.Jason Rees (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

• Good idea. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• Dead link - 2005 IMD ATCR

• Fixed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• Im surprised Land Depression 1 and BOB 02 have sections, I suspect they could be put into the other systems section quite easily.

• I moved BOB 02, since it was very short. Land Depression 1 has two paragraphs, so I opted to keep it separate.

• Generally speaking I think its better if you do not mention the winds in depressions/deep depressions in this basin its only either 25 kts or 30 kts.

• I didn't think it hurt to specify. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• No but I think it would make the article more readable in places.Jason Rees (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

• OK, I mostly adjusted the deep depressions and removed the wind references there. That work? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• On January 13, the IMD designated the system as a depression. -> remove the a and put Depression BOB 01.

• Do I have to? It's not mentioned in that source, and I don't feel like finding a source for that exact name :P Plus, I don't name any of the other D/DD's. Is that OK? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• The system organized further and developed rainbands. -> Whats the difference between rainbands and convection?

• Rainbands are convection that spiral around the circulation, like pinwheels on a bike. Well-organized rainbands are signs of good outflow, but outflow is the mechanism, whereas rainbands are the physical feature. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

• it was classified by the IMD on September 17 -> As what? An elephant or BOB 02

• A depression :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Ok everything looks good now and im passing.Jason Rees (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2015 (UTC)