Talk:2006 QH₁₈₁

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 QH181. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018154917/http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/dps.html to http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/dps.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Observation count

OK, so the "15" observations listed behind one of the cite links only show sightings over four nights (I assume the first two being only two days apart means they count as only a single opposition?), in 2006, 2008 and 2013. But the Hubble image at the top of the infobox claims to be taken in 2010 - does that not count for anything? Did they forget to take note of where the scope was pointed, so the object's position wasn't recoverable? It also looks plenty bright / high contrast enough in that picture for an over-23-mag object... 146.199.60.87 (talk) 23:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]