Talk:2010–11 Liga I

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Football (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the season article task force.
 

Correct alphabetical order[edit]

Correct alphabetical sorting according to Microsoft Excel is:

1 Astra Ploieşti
3 CFR Cluj
4 Dinamo Bucureşti
2 FC Braşov
7 FC Internaţional
13 FC Timişoara
17 FC Vaslui
12 FCM Târgu Mureş
5 Gaz Metan Mediaş
6 Gloria Bistriţa
8 Oţelul Galaţi
9 Rapid București
10 Sportul Studenţesc
11 Steaua Bucureşti
14 Unirea Urziceni
15 Universitatea Cluj
16 Universitatea Craiova
18 Victoria Brăneşti

Numbers in front show the order they were before. Catabv23 (talk) 18:42, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Note that the English use of language usually omits any occurrences of "FC" whatsoever unless it is needed for distinction purposes. This is also the consensus on this project. Why should the Romanian league treat things differently than every other league? --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 08:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
OK. In Romanian though it's rarely the case of saying the name of the team without the "FC". It has almost become a word (phonetical), rather than two letters. Catabv23 (talk) 12:25, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Image sizes and display resolutions[edit]

Not every user (in fact, the majority of users, as Wikipedia is not to PCs only) has a handy wide-screen TFT with a resolution of 1600x1200 or even larger at hand. As such, please keep the image sizes (map, stadia) a little smaller so that information accessibility is not hampered by "overly giant images". --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 08:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree with you, although that means that many other pictures on wikipedia topics should be resized to smaller, until the last CRT monitor will disapear.Catabv23 (talk) 16:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC)