Jump to content

Talk:2010 Sibu by-election/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Adabow (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Prose/MoS

[edit]
  • {{Infobox election}} should be included.
  • 'Nomination of candidates' section: after being mentioned once, Wong Ho Leng should be referred to by his surname, not his given name.
  • 'Election campaign issues' section: there is a bit of jargon that is unexplained, namely 'Sarawak OCCI SAC II Huzir Mohamed' – who is this person, is there a WP article about them (if so, provide a wikilink), what do the acronyms mean? Also explain 'RM18mil'. Reading on, I have realised that this is a currency, but it should be provided with a link the first time it is used, and 'million' should be spelt out in full, ie RM18 million. This should be kept consistent throughout the article (but only linking the first times it is used).
  • 'Results' section: The results table should be in descending numerical order, ie winner up the top
  • 'See also' section: Underscores should be replaced by spaces, and the links should be piped and reworded to avoid the '#' displaying. I note that both links are for the same article; are they both necessary?

References

[edit]
  • Citation 1 is dead, all others are live.

Broad/focussed

[edit]
  • Pretty broad, without going into minuscule details

Neutral

[edit]
  • Viewpoints represented equally and fairly

Stable

[edit]
  • No vandalism or unsettled disussions

Images

[edit]

Final comments

[edit]

There are some minor changes necessary, I will place the review on hold for seven days, awaiting improvements. Good luck improving the article! Adabow (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am satisfied with the improvements made to the article, and will now pass it. Congratulations! Adabow (talk) 08:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]