Talk:2011 MLS SuperDraft

Football: American & Canadian / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

picks 30-31 source:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/soccerinsider/2010/09/dc_united_news_notes_trade_inj.html?wprss=soccerinsider

Also, I'm pretty sure that Campos was for a 3rd rounder - the conditions were 8+ starts in 2009 for RSL to become a 2nd rounder, and I believe that means since he didn't that it's a 3rd rounder. But the url I have is no longer available (http://www.sltrib.com/sports/ci_12844130)

--Scaryice (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link for picks 30-31. I'm adding the Goff post to the references for both. Bubbagump24 (talk) 12:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Before editing for trades please make sure the trade involved a SuperDraft pick, not a Supplemental Draft pick. Thanks. Bubbagump24 (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Date format[edit]

Why does this article use the date format YYYY-MM-DD? WP:DATESNO says that "year-initial numerical (YYYY-MM-DD) dates (e.g. 1976-05-31) are uncommon in English prose, and should not be used within sentences". It does provide an exception for cases where space is an issue, such as in long lists or tables, but that does not seem to be an issue in this case. – Pee Jay 17:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you seeing this? --JonBroxton (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the "Trades" section. – Pee Jay 20:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, I see it now. Yeah, I don't know why that is like that. I admit I hadn't noticed it before, but now that you've pointed it out it does look odd. Probably should be changed to standard US date formatting. --JonBroxton (talk) 21:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He's going after me. I used the international date format when I listed all the draft pick trades that took place. I used the same format when I tracked down all the 2004 SuperDraft pick trades and am now receiving snippy comments for doing so.Bubbagump24 (talk) 21:04, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not "going after you", I'm "going after" wrong formatting. – Pee Jay 07:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]