Talk:2022–2023 Pakistan political unrest

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 March 2023 by reviewer Raydann (talk · contribs).

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani politics.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of 2022 Pakistani political crises into 2022–2023 Pakistan political unrest

WP:DUP: The two articles cover exactly the same subject. However, the article "Pakistan political unrest" is better written and referenced than the article "2022 Pakistani political crises". Fontaine347 (talk) 11:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Provided current article's information, paragraphs be not changed in case of merger, in that case yes, merger would be a viable decision. Wiki-political-pk (talk) 13:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support crisis is ongoing.

Panam2014 (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the May 9, 2023 arrest of Imran Kahn will bring numerous readers and a merger will eliminate having two similar articles on the topic. Also agree with Fontaine347 that the article the article "Pakistan political unrest" is in better condition. Jusdafax (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fontaine347, Wiki-political-pk, and Jusdafax: and 2023 Imran Khan arrest attempts ,2023 Pakistani protests and 2022 Azadi March II and 2022 Azadi March I? Panam2014 (talk) 12:16, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Azadi March II and 2022 Azadi March I can be kept separate, they seem to be different marches. But 2023 Imran Khan arrest attempts and 2023 Pakistani protests should be merged.--Fontaine347 (talk) 15:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Fontaine347. Jusdafax (talk) 18:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION AND BEING BAISED

Dear Administrator,

I am writing to bring to your attention a serious issue on a Wikipedia article that requires your attention. An editor has removed well-documented references to gross human rights violations from the article and accused me of bias when I added them back. Additionally, the same editor has placed a neutrality tag on the article without proper discussion or consensus.

As you are aware, Wikipedia has a strong commitment to neutrality and accuracy, and it is important that we do not ignore or suppress information that is relevant to the topic of an article. The human rights violations I added to the article are well-documented and should not be ignored or minimized.

I respectfully request that you look into this matter and take appropriate action. It appears that the editor in question is not adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If necessary, I am willing to participate in any discussion or mediation that can help resolve this issue.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Wiki-political-pk (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP;C-Class

Wikipedia:Content assessment/C-Class criteria : Following article has more than 70 citations, need a review

Wiki-political-pk (talk) 16:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Importance scale from Low to Top

It is an ongoing crisis and deserves a Top Importance in Pakistan's section

Wiki-political-pk (talk) 16:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Intercept claim

The Intercept claim about the alleged diplomatic should not be taken at face value as fact no evidence has been provided for such claim and this is clearly NPOV. It should say some like "alleged unverified cable" Monochromemelo1 (talk) 23:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]