Jump to content

Talk:2nd Battalion, 24th Marines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older logos out of history section

[edit]

What do you think about taking the older logos out of the main body of the article and putting them in a gallery at the bottom. While good to have they don't add anything to the body of the article and logos for ground units don't really retain the significance of logos for aviation units. Plus the pics there are good but it is too much with the logos added. I still think they belong for historical purposes i just think the article would look better with them out of the history. Let me know what you think.--205.110.147.14 (talk) 23:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer to keep the old logos. They're inserted in the approximate place in the hisotry corresponding to when they were used. Windyjarhead (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The old logo is the offical logo. This Mad Ghost spreading Mayhem is BS. Marines are supposed to spread order and discipline not chaos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heathen0302 (talkcontribs) 06:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

[edit]

To all who have contributed to this article. It is now good enough that it has been plagiarized by the Marine Corps:

http://www.marines.mil/community/marineweek/Pages/MarineHistory1.aspx

Outstanding. Windyjarhead (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice--Looper5920 (talk) 16:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2nd Battalion, 24th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2nd Battalion, 24th Marines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]