Talk:33d Network Warfare Squadron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Aviation / Aircraft (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 
Note icon
This article has been selected for use on the Aviation Portal.
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Merger[edit]

No consensus to merge. Armbrust The Homunculus 03:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is a separate article for the 31st Photographic Reconnaissance Squadron. The 31st was one of the first recce units to be converted to an intelligence unit. The change of number in 1947 to prevent confusion with the "other" 31st Reconnaissance Squadron may have helped this drop through the cracks. Anyway, the usual MOS:MILHIST#Units, formations, and bases justification applies. Lineagegeek (talk) 22:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Agree' Bwmoll3 (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Keep separate articles for USAAF and USAF era units. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Why?--Lineagegeek (talk) 22:15, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Change in unit number, name and mission. Time gap between inactivation and consolidation. Lack of article content overlap. Sufficient notability for content of existing articles. --Kkmurray (talk) 14:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.