Talk:600 (number)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mathematics

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's priority scale.

In accordance with a sensible procedure practiced by User:GUllman, the articles for the numbers 601 to 699 will be 'grown' here in the article on 600 until they are big enough to merit their own articles. Once that happens, a new page is created for the number in question, linking back to this page, and this page is changed to indicate that the number now has its own article. PrimeFan

Apologetic number?

This page indicates that 600 is an "apologetic number". I can't seem to find any definition of what an apologetic number is, have never heard of it, and everything I can find referencing an "apologetic number" just refers back to this page. Unless someone can provide a definition, it seems that this is just bogus information that has been spread around. 128.42.217.65 (talk) 22:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and have removed it.[1] PrimeHunter (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

proposed merger from 629

Makes complete sense and is a perfect time to remove useless junk info on that page. Pascal.Tesson 18:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This applies mainly to 613. Erudil 17:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC). It also applies to 656. Erudil 16:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

I removed this page from Wikiproject Judaism, but left the wikicode to retain the discussion. --Eliyak T·C 19:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is important information that Jerusalem is mentioned 656 times in the Hebrew Bible. It is regretable that this has been suppressed by some anti-Jewish vandal. Das Baz, aka Erudil 16:24, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am Jewish, and it's not important, except possibly to Kabbalahists. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 03:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

definition of significance

I just started going about editing and it appears there is some rules that I have missed reading.I am starting to read the guidelines but there are tons so I would appreciate if someone point me in the right direction to some definition of significance. I am confused because under number 713, the vault number in a fiction was noted, 558 in deep space nine, and 490 as number of available pokemons. i would normally categorize such cases as trivia with varying levels of triviality but since trivia is not allowed as implied by the revert on 694, how do i know whether a particular piece of info is considered significant?Kzl.zawlin (talk) 00:31, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

oops just realized that it's on top. my bad Kzl.zawlin (talk) 00:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidental counts

I just reverted the addition of "687...number of people in the Supreme People's Assembly of North Korea." I don't think such coincidental counts should be included. But I notice that there are a few others like it: the number of people killed in a hurricane disaster, the name of an Australian telephone socket, the area codes for Phoenix, and Minneapolis and so on. Do others these kind of entries should be purged? SpinningSpark 08:33, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:300 (number) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ 2401:1900:108A:40E7:5C9B:85FF:FEE4:4D46 (talk) 07:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel wani James

wani 197.231.239.133 (talk) 11:44, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]