Talk:8-bit clean

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

SMTP and NNTP section[edit]

The first paragraph unter "SMTP and NNTP 8-bit cleanness" is not worth to be here in Wikipedia. There are no sources, it is rather written like a political speech than like a Wikipedia article and so I think it should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.16.74.3 (talkcontribs) 13:26, 23 June 2010

The whole section is borderline incoherent original research that does not appear to be relevant. I can find no relevant mention of these issues (that people believe them to not be clean but they actually are) outside of unreliable mailing lists and fora. The first part of the article is far better - being meaningful and relevant. I see no reason why this section should be kept as it is. Any attempts to improve it would do better starting from scratch. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 14:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
OrangeDog, I'm sure you mean well. But I am uncomfortable with deleting the only section in the article with any references, leaving the article without any references.
In accordance with the suggestions in Wikipedia:Don't hope the house will build itself as well as WP:DEMOLISH,
I restored that section, added a few more references, and heavily edited it. --DavidCary (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Objections to "just send 8" - who, why, when?[edit]

In the mid-1990s, people objected to "just send 8 bits (to RFC 821 SMTP servers)", perhaps because of a perception that "just send 8 bits" is an implicit declaration that ISO 8859-1 become the new "standard encoding", forcing everyone in the world to use the same character set.

Who are these people, what were in fact their specific objections, why 8859-1 in particular, and where are the citations? "Perhaps" is not good enough for an encyclopaedia! Hairy Dude (talk) 23:04, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Please, look exactly to references given:
Sadly, there are many Wikipedians willingly inserting various {{or}} and {{who}} instead of looking to the sources (which are specified) and improving a wording. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)