Jump to content

Talk:81P/Wild

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perhihelion

[edit]

The perihelion is stated in the article as being about 1 au; however, in the stats, it's about 1.5 au. That's a pretty big difference; it ought to be fixed to tell which it is.--Solasis 02:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

[edit]

imo, the "enhanced" photo is bs. judging from the original photo, it seems that the asteroid has a round shape. where is the sense in masking out only the light parts and putting a nonsensical glow around it? -- Paniq 10:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think, the photo is an overlay of two pictures with different exposure time. The "nonsensical glow" are actual jets of gas and dust from the comet's nucleus. Awolf002 15:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Return date

[edit]

"Together with collected interstellar dust, these samples were returned to Earth on January 15, 2006." Should this not be 'will be returned to Earth' or is the date wrong? 62.56.27.105 14:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC) bluecont[reply]

Television reference

[edit]

This given reference does not show that the comet plays an important role in the plot. I think this is completely non-notable and useless trivia in that case, and I will delete it if nobody objects. Awolf002 20:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got no feedback, so I removed it. Awolf002 03:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mass and dimensions

[edit]

Amino acid discovery

[edit]

"NASA researchers have discovered glycine...samples of Comet Wild 2 returned by Stardust"

Also methylamine and ethylamine were found, I guess they just wanted to leave that out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.125.176.9 (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2]

I think this is worth mentioning on this page and the article on Stardust as well. --114.76.62.26 (talk) 09:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 81P/Wild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 81P/Wild. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]