Talk:Audit Bureau of Circulations (UK)

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business: Accounting Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ABC

http://www.abc.org.uk/cgi-bin/gen5?runprog=nav/abc&type=page&p=&menuid=abcnews%7Cpjfaqs is an information page for journalists, and the ABC encourages journalists to use this information (and its press releases - http://www.abc.org.uk/cgi-bin/gen5?runprog=nav/abc&type=page&p=abc_news.htm&menuid=abcnews%7Ccurrentpr) as and when needed, verbatim or otherwise.

Under British law, this would be Fairdealing, and I believe this would be a suitable start for this ABC page.

SharQ 16:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Directly using someone else’s words without attribution is still a really bad idea. See WP:COPYPASTE and WP:PLAG. Not to mention the fact that anything written by the subject about itself is likely to be self-promotional and biased (see WP:NPOV and WP:COI). —67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:09, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Audit Bureau of Circulations (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130523170816/http://abc-ireland.ie/ to http://www.abc-ireland.ie/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130523170816/http://abc-ireland.ie/ to http://www.abc-ireland.ie/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]