Advertising for Certichron's services?

Untitled

It appears User:Tglassy added a couple links to promote his services (diff) - a link to his company's web site and a link to an article that expresses his opinion about the legality of GPS timestamps. (The title of the link is misleading - it sounds like a court ruled that they were inadmissible, where it's really just his opinion.) I appreciate that he made other improvements to the article, but this feels like it is not a neutral point-of-view. Crouchingturbo (talk) 01:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ANSI ASC X9.95 Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]