Talk:A Dainty Politician
 | A Dainty Politician has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:A Dainty Politician/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
I'll have this done soon JAGUAR 15:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Initial comments[edit]
- "Little is known of the actual production, but it received mixed reaction for the plausibility of its plot" - really? The Production section is quite broad
- "The plot of the film includes a nod to the Women's suffrage movement" - might sound better as "reference"
- "The role of the cameraman was uncredited in 1910 productions" - All of them? I could have sworn reviewing some articles that had cameramen credited
- "Credits may have included Anna Rosemond, one of two leading ladies of the Thanhouser company in this era" - informal, how about actresses
- Some of the quotes in the reception section are too long and would be better of being paraphrased
References[edit]
- No dead links
- Ref 4 is missing an access date
Close - promoted[edit]
Another well researched 1910 film, I cannot find anything major enough that would make this be put on hold. It is well researched, well written and all of the references are in check. Well done JAGUAR 20:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)