Talk:A Rugrats Passover/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: @harej 07:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): See below.

b (MoS): Some terms are linked twice: 1995 in television, some of the writers' names, and the Exodus to name a few.

- - Yeah, it's okay to link an article once in the lead and once in the text. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Yes

b (citations to reliable sources): Yes

c (OR): No original research
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): The "Production" section seems lacking. Supposedly a different production method was used, but this is not elaborated upon.

- - I've expanded it with some extra info. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

b (focused): Yes
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: Yes
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.: No edit wars
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Yes

b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Is the picture of Moses really necessary?

- - I believe it helps give context to the user, so yeah. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass

I suggest recasting "special season three episode".
- Done. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Minka is upset and cries to her daughter Didi as she and the family arrives." I suspect "she" refers to Didi, but this could be made clearer.
- Tried my best to reword it. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"The Pharaoh's treachery causes Moses to curse her once more, with a plague that declares all first-born Egyptian children will be taken, which includes the Pharaoh." So the Pharaoh is the child? My understanding of the Exodus story is that it was Pharoah's son that was killed, not the Pharaoh himself.
- The special makes Angelica, a three-year-old, the Pharaoh, so in this, the Pharaoh is a kid. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Gabor Csupo, co-creator of Rugrats,[5] however, stated that the episode was of significant importance because of the "historical interest" and the different production approach used." How was this episode produced differently from the others?
- I've expanded the whole production section, so that part has been expanded as well. The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"while Stew and his side of the family's beliefs focus on an opposite sanctification." What is an opposite sanctification?
- The source only says that they are "not Jewish." The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"it received incredibly high Nielsen Ratings" This is a subjective statement.
- How? The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, "incredibly high" is a matter of perception. High compared to what? It would be more appropriate to put the actual rating, perhaps in addition to noting that the rating this episode did receive is in fact high compared to most other TV shows. (Besides, I am pretty sure every episode of Rugrats had an incredibly high Nielsen rating compared to Emily's Reasons Why Not). @harej 20:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - The source only says that it was the "highest rated program" Nick broadcast at the time. ~~The actual rating is unknown. Is there any way you want me to reword it to fit better?~~ The Flash ^{talk} 20:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Reworded to say "[...]incredibly high Nielsen Ratings compared to other television programs[...]" The Flash ^{talk} 20:32, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        If the actual numbers are not available, that is fine. @harej 20:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"aired and contracted 3.7 million viewers" Is "contracted" really the right verb to use here?
- Changed "contracted" to "received." The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
@harej 07:47, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review! The Flash ^{talk} 15:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have promoted the article. @harej 20:56, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! :) The Flash ^{talk} 00:34, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]