Talk:A Sport of Nature

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reception

The line cited under "reception" isn't from the Nobel prize citation itself, which is much briefer than the text on that page (just ten to twenty words and aiming to sum up the entire literary achievement of the laureate); rather, the essay on the linked page looks like a reworked transcript of the address (the honorary speech) delivered in honour of Gordimer at the Nobel Prize ceremony or the following banquet. It was given by one of the members of the Academy, and indeed by the man who had had a large share in introducing modern South African and Black African writers in Sweden, but it's not the actual citation.

By the way, Wästberg is right that this is likely Gordimer's most hazardous undertaking, and perhaps the one that was most prone to inspire controversy outside of Africa (SA or other African countries), because it aims to predict r/l history (in the future, at the time) while also laying itself open to some plausible charges of glossing over difficulties in order to achieve heroic portraits of the female protagonist Hillela and the president who is clearly intended to be read as Mandela. "Heroic political storytelling", partisan fiction mixed with fairy-tale of this kind is often not seen as okay for a top-rank literary writer in the modern world, and the book must have inspired quite divided responses in its time. The reception section should be carefully expanded. 83.254.150.36 (talk) 08:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What nonsense! Hillela marries the President of a fictitious African country - not the President of South Africa. - Sanderson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.111.113.75 (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]