Talk:Accumulated cyclone energy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Subpages by year: AtlanticE. PacificW. PacificN. IndianSouth
Subpages by ACE: AtlanticE. PacificW. PacificN. IndianSouth

What happened to all the ACE data?[edit]

This page used to have a useful list of ACE data by year - where did all of the information go? It was a helpful reference for comparing activity across years. CounterintuitiveCyborg (talk) 16:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is in the middle of a clean up in order to recognise that the index is used around the world and not just in the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific basins. The data that you are looking for was merged with Atlantic hurricane season and Pacific hurricane, where the data is better placed since ACE is just one metric used to assess seasons.Jason Rees (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jason Rees has decided that it would be better to remove all that information (by consensus of people with username "Jason Rees") and while moving it, destroy its usefulness by removing it from one sortable table.--Prosfilaes (talk) 06:49, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Uselles change, confusing me, you just made me mad cause this page was the easiest and most readable way of reading Acumulated Cyclone Energ. Uselles. Change. Andreiii3213 (talk) 16:49, 7 september 2020 (UTC+2 [Polish summer time)
@Andreiii3213: I am sorry that it makes you mad that we have had to remove the list of Atlantic ACE, but it makes me mad to see such a big list of the ACE for the Atlantic. Especially when the list is unsourced, no consensus as to how it should be calculated and is used around the world by more than just NOAA. Jason Rees (talk) 17:22, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This page is supposed to be an overview of ACE in a global stance and should not focus on specifics regarding each basin. There needs to be a point at where ACE is cut off here. It should only display the top years of each basin. The ACE for the past hundred years needs to be listed in each basin's overview page, not here. NoahTalk 22:17, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricane Noah: And where exactly is the top-list in the Atlantic basin's overview page? Yours, Ciciban (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to make a new section with the WPAC typhoon ACE data, but I’m lacking ACE calculations. For example, it says on the 2004 page that the ACE was 480, but where do you guys get the seasonal ACE total? DavidTheMeteorologistTalk 12:29, 9 September, 2020 (EDT)
The problem with the ACE Index for the WPAC would that we have no evidence that the JMA has defined the ACE or uses it, which means that its OR imo. However, putting that to one side I wonder how valid that ACE figure in 2004 WPAC is - especially when you notice that the source was published in January 2005 before the JTWC publically released their BT.Jason Rees (talk) 18:42, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We should not have any ACE information on the western Pacific, but you do not have consensus to outright remove all the ACE tables given the expressed opposition above, and by me below.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite what "extremely inactive season" is and where it is cited. 216.15.124.9 (talk) 18:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WPAC / Southern Hemisphere totals[edit]

http://tropical.atmos.colostate.edu/Realtime/index.php have the ACE totals for two basins but the data is deleted at the end of every season. Thingofme (talk) 16:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah the other problem with using CSU's totals is that they are based on the JTWC's intensity estimates rather than the relevant RSMC/TCWC.Jason Rees (talk) 16:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are some problems with this, as ACE counts outside of EPAC/NATL are not well documented. Thingofme (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ioke record[edit]

I read many sources articles written that Ioke's record is 85~85.3, why is it only 82 here. Bóng Ma - Talk 21:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It probably comes down to how you handle the JMAs winds for Ioke.Jason Rees (talk) 22:28, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yep, and now, Freddy has reached 82.2 ACE points, has this record been surpassed or not? Vệ Thần - Talk 21:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let's wait and find out what BT and the WMO says. Jason Rees (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possible link error[edit]

The links to the second reference (Climate Assessment for 1999) is not working for me, neither the link to the URL nor the DOI. I'm reporting it here rather than identifying it as a bad link or fixing it on the chance that it's a one-off glitch that will be fixed by itself.

If it isn't a short-term glitch, I believe the article can be found at Climate Assessment for 1999 S Philbrick(Talk) 17:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]