From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Accuracy paradox article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- Woehr, David J., "Understanding frame-of-reference training: The impact of training on the recall of performance information.", Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol 79(4), Aug 1994, 525-534. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.525
- Fernandes, J.A. / Irigoien, X. / Goikoetxea, N. / Lozano, J.A. / Inza, I. / Perez, A. / Bode, A., "Fish recruitment prediction, using robust supervised classification methods", Ecological Modelling, 221 (2), p.338-352, Jan 2010, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.020
- measurement accuracy paradox
- Huxel, Paul John Navigation algorithms and observability analysis for formation flying missions 1977 Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2006. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
- speed-accuracy paradox
- Karl M. Newell (1980). Stelmach, George E.; Requin, Jean, eds. The speed-accuracy paradox in movement control: Errors of time and space, in: Tutorials in motor behavior. Advances in Psychology (Amsterdam). 1. North-Holland. pp. 501–510. ISBN 9780444854667. LCCN 8010905 Check
|lccn=value (help). Retrieved 26 March 2010.
- agreement-accuracy paradox
Solutions to the accuracy paradox
- The correct solution to the 'paradox' is to think about the information gained by using the model instead of the accuracy. See Information_gain_in_decision_trees for an example of how to measure the information (conditional entropy). This concept worked out for the example currently on the page would add value to this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bscan (talk • contribs) 19:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)