Talk:Acts of Peter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Christianity (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Religious texts (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a joint subproject of WikiProject Religion and WikiProject Books, and a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religious texts-related subjects. Please participate by editing [[::Acts of Peter|this article]], and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 

I have replaced the drivel anti-Catholic diatribe that was added as the new article with info found on a respectable site quoting the Anchor Bible Dictionary (not sure of the copyright implications) Kuratowski's Ghost 22:26, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)


Could someone correct this phrase? "during the second half of the 2d century". Does this mean the 2nd century? (03/04/2007)


Can we get some citations, especially those in regards to dating the manuscript.96.32.183.205 (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Quo vadis[edit]

If the source, of at least most common usage of the phrase Quo vadis is from the Acts of Peter, this should be mentioned in the article. 78.69.107.39 (talk) 08:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Apocryphal[edit]

there is no such thing as an apocryphal gospel. wouldn't heretic or heterodox,or non canonical be a better term? 67.176.160.47 (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2010 (UTC)