Talk:Adani Group/Archives/2017
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adani Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601084050/http://www.iammadeinindia.com/?p=1024 to http://www.iammadeinindia.com/?p=1024
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
No mention of corruption allegations?
Why does this article not mention the extensive corruption allegations against Adani? For instance http://www.smh.com.au/business/mining-and-resources/adani-faces-questions-over-conduct-at-home-20151001-gjzed1.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.95.194 (talk) 08:49, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Adani Foundation
not enough information to stand on its own DGG ( talk ) 07:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed, but additionally, the incoming page benefits from the context of the group. Given no objections over more than 2 years,
Done Klbrain (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2017 (UTC)