Talk:After (2019 film)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Consistent problems with box office data and fighting over critic responses in the article

The edit history for this page is a mess. I can't tell if half of the edits are based on actual box office data, or if they're just fan edits. How much did this film make on opening week? What were its numbers on opening night? Please stop editing the take-home this film got if it doesn't line up with box office data.

The constant removal, re-instatement and re-writes of the critic responses probably are fan edits - we seem to vacillate between 'critical response was negative', 'critical response was mixed' and 'there were many positive reviews'. I don't know if you can lock just one paragraph on a page, but it's tempting to imagine.

Positive or negative, are they or aren't they? Unless someone can come up with a citation for the responses posited in the article, it should be taken out. Normally it wouldn't be cause for The World's Biggest Red Flag of Impartiality since it's just one line but with the amount of edits this page gets, it is getting to be that way. It needs to be sourced, otherwise it's just open for fan attacks, as it's already uncited.

Let's keep try to Wikipedia standards up, even for the smallest page on, of all things, a YA movie adapted from a Wattpad novel. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gone too far

You've gone back too far and removed reviews from the article, please restore them. Add more if you think other details are needed.

The runtime was changed from 108 minutes to 106 minutes, but this was also reverted. When there's any disagreement about the runtime the simplest thing is to add a source, and the BBFC says the runtime is 106 minutes. Please restore the correct runtime of 106 minutes.

I know vandalism is annoying but please be more careful when reverting. -- 109.78.249.75 (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]