Talk:Aisha Bibi

	Asia portal Aisha Bibi is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kazakhstan (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

SOURCES

I wrote this article two years ago based on an archeology from the journal asiatics antiques. I'll dig through my notes and add sources in the next few weeks--Gurdjieff (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted "Uighur" word, as this fact cannot be proved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.82.106.46 (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

references

I have added most of the references used for the article, but i still need to wikify them, is there a template for central asia historic sites?--Gurdjieff (talk) 21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

references have been updated and infobox added--Gurdjieff (talk) 05:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

bibi

in the article it says it is for "fiancée Aisha-Bibi" But Bibi means aunt (father's sisters in Turkish) So the info fiancée should be verified —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.237.254 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]