Talk:Albania–Turkey relations/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Werónika (talk · contribs) 21:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Currently in the process of review. Please check back soon! Werónika (talk) 21:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Werónika. Thank you for undertaking the review. Looking forward to working with you on the article. Best.Resnjari (talk) 07:24, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
|
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
|
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
|
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
|
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. |
|
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
|
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
|
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
|
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
I'm sorry, but after reading the intro and the first body paragraph, I'm going to have to quick-fail this because it's nowhere near meeting GA criteria. The grammar (especially your usage of commas, repetition of words, and sentence structure) needs a lot of work; I would highly recommend having this article copyedited at the Guild of Copy Editors WikiProject. Doing so will also help you avoid problematic words that also interfere with NPOV. The coverage and breadth of this article are also lacking. You provide a lot of historical context about the Ottoman Empire in the lead (most of which is unsourced), but then you don't discuss it in further detail in the body. Ultimately, this is a Wikipedia article about modern-day Albania–Turkey relations, so you should keep this information to a minimum. A lot of the wording is also very vague; you talk a lot about "cooperation" and "ties" which could really mean anything. And lastly, please provide more reliable citations, ones that do not contradict what you actually say. |