Jump to content

Talk:Algérie française

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

l'algerie est payé uindépendant qui ne depent pas de la france qui a des racines dans les ciecles passés (des racines kabile et arab 41.201.193.58 (talk) 10:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

et ta soeur? les arabes n'ont fait qu'envahir l'algérie comme l'ont fait les français. l'algérie est avant tout le pays des berbères, son peuple d'origine, et tu as oublié les racines romaines de l'algérie (et ses racines françaises centenaires puisque tu parles français en algérie). and use english! Cliché Online (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

integral parts?

[edit]

"By integral parts, it is meant that they have their deputies (representatives) in the French National Assembly" to my knowledge that was the case, Pierre Lagaillarde was Deputy of Algiers... Cliché Online (talk) 10:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

seems more and more this article is BS. famous adolphe crémieux was deputy of algiers. french algeria departements were integral parts of france. Cliché Online (talk) 10:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to French Algeria?

[edit]

I agree with the proposal. --Mistakefinder (talk) 10:25, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, unless French Algeria was actually only officially Algerie and Algerie francaise was only a slogan. Then the fork makes sense. — LlywelynII 10:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

four dots and a dash?

[edit]

First, this needs a source. Second, I was told it was al-ge-rie (three dots) fran-caise (2 dashes).

A source would settle the issue. My idea is total hearsay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.83.184 (talk) 19:37, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

or perhaps 3 dots and 2 dashes because in a word each syllable is given the same length in French. So the four dots and a dash wouldn't agree with that either. Very curious to see if someone can find a source on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.231.155 (talk) 17:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]