Jump to content

Talk:Aliqoli Mirza Qajar/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ganesha811 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, using the template below. Hoping to complete the review over the next week. Ganesha811 (talk) 19:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Amir Ghandi: unfortunately I cannot accept reviewing this article with copyright violations, so it will be quick-failed. However, I do appreciate the work you have put in to this article and it is a very interesting subject. I encourage you to remove the copyright violations and nominate the article again. Ganesha811 (talk) 19:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  • Earwig shows extensive copying of phrases and whole sentences from the Encyclopedia Iranica entry on the subject. These are clear copyright violations. Unfortunately, this means this review is likely a quick-fail per WP:GAFAIL. I would be happy to review the article again once the copyright violations have been removed.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment.