Talk:Alpha Ursae Majoris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Astronomy / Astronomical objects  (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon Alpha Ursae Majoris is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Watch your language[edit]

Can somebody transliterate 斗 & 天樞? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 01:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Dubhe as a pole star?[edit]

Currently, the article states that Dubhe is the northern pole star for 5100 BC and 20500 AD. During these points in the Earth's axial precession, Dubhe's declination is less than 60 degrees. On the other hand, Alkaid, which is brighter than Dubhe, will have a declination of over 75 degrees. Though neither is as ideal as Polaris is currently (over 89 degrees and nearly as bright), wouldn't Alkaid be a better choice? -- (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that Dubhe should not be considered to be a pole star, and recommend that the text stating that it was and will be be removed ASAP. For reference, take a look at, for example. The precession circle comes nowhere near the Big Dipper. Doesper (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree. The claim that it was the Pole Star is ludicrous. I'll remove it now. - Gnomon —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)