Talk:An Assisted Elopement (1910 film)

An Assisted Elopement (1910 film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 19, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:An Assisted Elopement/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DepressedPer (talk · contribs) 08:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look into this one.

Here's what I found:

The film being lost is mentioned a second time in the Plot section; remove it and rewrite the first sentence as: "The Moving Picture World synopsis states:".
"The New York Dramatic Mirror review was positive despite having been a story already been done by another studio outside of the Edison Trust." Remove the second 'been'.
The Thanhouser refs should have the following: work=Thanhouser Films: An Encyclopedia and History.
The Newspapers.com refs should mention they come from that website and is open access.

This will be put on hold for you to handle the problems. DepressedPer (talk) 23:11, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DepressedPer: - Thanks for the ping, fixes done. Not sure why the bot removes the notices and not others so quickly. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a GA. DepressedPer (talk) 17:33, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.