Talk:Anchor modeling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Diagram needs a legend[edit]

Very nice article, however, the included graphic is in desperate need of a legend.

As someone who does not know Anchor Modeling, but is very eager to extend their DB theory and practice, I find myself confounded by this one simple thing. When I look at the diagram, I cannot readily tell what is an Anchor, Knot, Tie, or an Attribute, and thus I cannot relate the descriptions and examples in the text of the article to their visual form. I know that the text preceding the diagram tries to address this, but it's not succeeding. So please make it easy for us to figure this out: add a graphical map showing what visual object types correspond to the textual names of those object types. I.E., a legend. RBarryYoung (talk) 19:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let me also add that although referencing Entity-Relationship modeling is fine, relying on the reader to be conversant in it in order to understand the immediate diagram is not. Worse, the visual conventions of ER-diagramming have been far more diverse and inconsistent over the last 30 years than most advocates are willingly to admit. So even though I have a passing familiarity with basic Chen ER-diagramming, I still cannot tell if that was the ER style that Anchor Modeling "resembles", nor what parts of it apply to Anchor Modeling diagrams. In particular I am not sure what the lines between the elements are supposed to mean, nor what a line with an open circle in the middle, or a closed circle or no circle is supposed to distinguish. So the lines also should be explained somewhere. RBarryYoung (talk) 20:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anchor modeling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720172604/https://www.tdwi.eu/en/events/conferences/tdwi-2007-europe.html?tx_fhconference_pi1_conference_view%5Bshow%5D=online_program&tx_fhconference_pi1_conference_view%5Bsession%5D=39 to https://www.tdwi.eu/en/events/conferences/tdwi-2007-europe.html?tx_fhconference_pi1_conference_view%5Bshow%5D=online_program&tx_fhconference_pi1_conference_view%5Bsession%5D=39

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag (September 2023)[edit]

Creator of "anchor modeling" largely wrote this page. intforce (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]