Talk:Andrew Havill/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Etriusus (talk · contribs) 02:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
I'll also grab this review since I'm here. Comments will be made momentarily.
Copy-vios
[edit]- Nothing notable as of yet, Earwig looks good
Images
[edit]- Only one image that is properly licensed.
Sources
[edit]- "Andrew Havill - biography". What makes this source reliable? Seems to be a CV
- Whatculture is generally unreliable. There may be room for this specific citation seeing how its used by that needs to be hashed out
- A review of the sources shows that many are formatted incorrectly. Please review WP:CITEHOW
Frankly, a lot of citations are missing. This is rather self apparent and I won't go about listing every single source that is missing.
Alright, this page is also going to fail. Similar to Glynis Johns, this page is lacking in multiple sources at least a dozen and a half instances. This is a WP:BLP and therefore needs to have citations, otherwise it is ineligible for WP:GA and at risk of WP:STUBIFY. Please make sure you have reviewed Wikipedia:Good article criteria prior to nominating.