Talk:Animal People

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello, I created this page and urge the administrators to keep it for the following reasons.

I am not associated with the organization and this is not a self-advertisement.
Animal People is an international animal rights organization, similar to other organizations with Wikipedia pages (PETA, Best Friends, Animals Asia Foundation, etc) with an international reach.
Animal People has high name recognition internationally among the animal rights and animal welfare community (Just taking the information provided by Merritt Clifton, editor of the influential publication Animal People, in his analysis... from this New Zealand source)
Pages from equivalent organizations include unverified statements. Note, for example, the 2nd pagagraph of the PETA page.
Animal People is the subject of widespread news accounts; there are at least 258 mentions of the editors' work archived at NewsLibrary.com. A google search for the name of the editor (Merritt Clifton) on the google INDIA site returns nearly two and a half million hits.
The editor's involvment in the recent controversy controversy in Bangalore is indicative of Animal People's long-standing international involvement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodlandpath (talk • contribs) 17:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Animal People research is widely quoted and widely influential.
Wikipedia needs this page to be inclusive, non-biased, and authoritative.

Woodlandpath (talk) 16:46, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... (your reason here) --Truthhunt007 (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2011 (UTC) This page does not promote the publication Animal People, it documents its history and the role it has played in the animal welfare movement domestically and internationally. Scores of other animal welfare groups, such as the ASPCA and HSUS, also have Wikipedia pages that offer a similar format. That data gathered by Animal People -- rabies, sheltering statistics and much more -- is widely distributed and greatly depended upon by animal welfare groups of all sizes.[reply]

ANILA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.92.136.168 (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Animal People. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]