Talk:Annan Thampi

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

POV fluff and context

In this edit I scaled back some of the adoration that was prevalent in the box office section. "Highly successful" is needless puffery, particularly when there are virtually no financial figures or any context, like comparisons to other films, to put the claim into perspective. It's a subjective declaration that is being presented as a fact, and it's certainly not consistent with WP:NPOV. In the same edit I added some context in the form of an analysis by a Rediff writer, who believed that part of the success of the film was due to a lack of competition. I would not be surprised if this rankled some people, but this is exactly the sort of context we need in a neutral encyclopedia. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]