Talk:Anthe (moon)

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Spoken Wikipedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles

Name

This moon is now named Anthe. --Volcanopele 17:30, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved, and trying to fix references in other articles. --Patteroast 23:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs an IAUC link at Naming of natural satellites#References and timeline. RandomCritic 02:01, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 19,2007 Originally named "Frank" by Cassini scientists. Source: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/news/cassinifeatures/feature20070719/ Salmonammon (talk) 22:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spoken Wikipedia recording

I've just uploaded an audio recording of the article. Please let me know if I've mispronounced anything. :-) --Mangst (talk) 01:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

actual size?

The main list of Saturnian satellites says it's ~0.007 x 10^15 kg, and ~1km ... obviously its dimensions might not be entirely certain at the moment, but 7 gigatonnes vs 5 gigatonnes, and 2km vs 1km is quite some difference, to appear on two hyperlinked lists...

Also, many of the individual moon pages lack things like surface gravity figures etc - if we have the size, mass, density already, can't that and probably several others be calculated from them? 209.93.141.17 (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

edit: never mind, I found the data on NASA's website, and have updated the details here accordingly; will attempt similar on the primary list as well. 209.93.141.17 (talk) 19:09, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]