I am quick-failing this nomination as the article is severely under-referenced, the lead does not fully summarise the article, the prose is not good apparently written by someone with a poor grasp of English, the article fails to conform to the key elements of the manual of style. Please familiarise yourself with the good article criteria, work to ensure that the article meets those criteria, then try a peer review before re-nominating at GAN. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.