Talk:Aror

Pakistan: Sindh Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sindh.

Dynasty claims[edit]

Hi wikipedia , user Nirmohiji is making regular edits , with no source that Aror was capital of Arorh dynasty . The whole story about parshuram has also no source and is cooked up . Infact i have put up a reliable source about Aror that it was capital of Ror dynasty .Please look into this matter . Rudradaman127 (talk) 09:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ror dynasty was identified as faux and hence was deleted by the senior administrators on Wikipedia. You may please check.Nirmohiji (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 08:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removal from Wikipedia can't erase dynasty Anuj Choudhary Ror (talk) 14:21, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ror dynasty is well documented officially by govt of pakistan and govt of india , and its presence is still felt in sindh today even . removing it from wikipedia cant erase a well established dynasty accepted all over . Rudradaman127 (talk) 01:11, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism and adding random & unreliable sources by user: Nirmohiji[edit]

User:Nirmohiji is repeatedly doing vandalism on page and adding unreliable and random sources on this page , as no one is checking their reliablity . Even most of the references he have mentioned do not contain a single word , of what he has quoted . There is no such thing as Arora Dynasty ever , but he is repeatedly quoting and editing Aror Dynasty on the page , with any random source . Even the story of parshuram is being added repeatedly with random unreliable source , which is faux , there is no such story in hindu puranas and in those books , which he had added in reference . Please take action . Rudradaman127 (talk) 01:16, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry claim[edit]

Anuj Choudhary Ror and Rudradaman127 (talk) are making similar disruptive edits, are probably the same. Roundish Utcursch Kindly acknowledge the issue. Nirmohiji (talk) 05:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]