Talk:AssessGrid
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from https://www.cetic.be/internal499.html. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009081910040186. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
This article is perfectly in line with Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:DCM. The orginal contributers are part of the project, as can be easily verified, as is CETIC that owns the mentioned webpages. Hence one should assume the content was put on Wikipedia under Wikipedia style of copyright license as stated in Wikipedia:DCM. If there are doubts, this could be discussed with the contributors or on the article's discussion page. But I do not see evidence of either. So putting this article on a list for speedy deletion is not correct. Ademmen (talk) 12:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I'm the creator and owner of content at URL http://www.cetic.be/internal499.html .
CETIC, the organisation I work, for is partner in AssesGrid and I worked on this project for CETIC.
As part of the project, I re-used portions of the content I created on CETIC web site (at URL http://www.cetic.be/internal499.html) to write Wikipedia article about AssessGrid.
I also agree to put this content under Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA).
Therefore, on 19th August 2009 I wrote a copyright request to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org with copy to Odej Kao, coordinator of the project.
I hope this will help solve the misunderstanding with content and copyright of AssessGrid article.
Smouton (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2009 (CET)
- This article cam due today for deletion at WP:CV. Given that permission was sent on Aug 19, I will relist this for another week to allow more time for processing at OTRS. — CactusWriter | needles 19:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Defunct?[edit]
The web site no longer works for me. Should we delete as a non-notable project? It has no independent sources at all and just other inline links. W Nowicki (talk) 21:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)